GERMANY'S NEW MAPS ASSERT GERMANY'S LATEST DREAMS OF A 4th REICH

The fourth reich is alive, it is the re-unified Germany which was re-unified in violation of international law. Among it's creation the fourth reich immediately set out creating it's zone of influence/occupation which became evident with Germany's forceful destruction of Yugoslavia. The following is taken from http://www.freenations.freeuk.com/gc-63.html and the German article it was translated from is available at http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/de/fulltext/56679.

- How the Fourth Reich views the modern day Mitteleuropa, their are some versions that include more trritory.

GERMANY'S NEW MAPS ASSERT ETHNIC GERMAN EMPIRE IN EUROPE

INTRODUCTION We at Freenations have long provided conclusive proof of the German imperialist nature of the the embryo Euro-State and its effective achievement in the last few decades of the 20th century of everything which two world wars failed to deliver. One of the many ways in which this new power over our country, our parliament and our people and the once free nation states of Europe has been achieved is by the drawing of maps. Regionalism undermines nation states. Economic centralism undermines the logic of nation states. EU bureaucratic centralism overrides national Parliaments. On mainland Europe racial and ethnic politics - funded by the German Government and based on Nazi founded organisations like the Federal Union of European Ethnic Groups - are also exploited to wipe out national boundaries. By eliminating those boundaries Germany can revert to the power of the Volk, (ethnic Germans, wherever they are) to form a new power base. This report translated by Edward Spalton is perhaps the most blatant use of map drawing to promote German ethnic, imperial and economic hegemony over the nations of Europe.No wonder our German journalist friends in this report see echoes of the Nazi era.

A report by the German journalists of www.german-foreign-policy.com ,Dated 22 December 2006. Translated 28 December 2006 by Edward Spalton for www.freenations.freeuk.com

BERLIN (own report) On the eve of Germany’s presidency of the EU, German cartographical plans for a “large scale reordering of Europe” have come to light. These maps were produced at the request of the German Foreign Office and are intended for the political and administrative use of German authorities. In these presentations, Germany dominates the area called “Middle Europe” as the country with the largest population. Great Britain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands are excluded. Denmark, Spain, Italy and Portugal also do not belong to “Middle Europe”. Former Yugoslavia up to the Albanian frontier and thirteen other states in Eastern Europe do. According to the themes developed “areas historically ruled by the predominantly German-speaking states” are the most “suitable” for inclusion in the “The cultural space (Kulturraum) of Middle Europe”.

The accompanying charts designate parts of France, Denmark, the whole of Luxemburg, Switzerland and upper Italy to the political fiction of a German-dominated centre. Naturally, Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary are taken into the project. Various areas are claimed as part of “Middle Europe” because they were originally part of the German Reich, “quite separately” from their later conquest by the Nazis. German-foreign-policy.com is publishing excerpts from these charts which bear a worrying similarity to projections made by the predecessor states of the German Federal Republic.

The charts themselves arise from a “definite request” by the German Foreign Office, intended to form a “position paper on the reordering of Europe into large regions”. The plan was discussed in the “Standing Committee for Geographical Names” (StAGN), a body little known outside specialist circles, of which the Director of the Leibniz-Institute for Territorial Science is a member.(2) This institution enjoys state funding and publishes authoritative guidance for geopolitical purposes. The German specialists in re-ordering are supposedly geographers but have repeatedly produced work affecting the sovereign rights of foreign states. In the institute, “Lebensraum” is a matter frequently discussed. (3)

Although the project was prepared by a state authority for national political use, it is claimed that the supra national interests of the presentation “for the large scale reordering of Europe” were conceived “without taking account of national political intentions” (4) . Over many pages the concept displays a germano-centric view of Europe in which the Germans are seen as “settlers and bearers of culture outside the present German-speaking areas”. With total insensitivity to historic changes in national state identities, it is maintained that “From the 11th and twelfth centuries, Germans settled in compact communities in large parts of present day Poland, the Baltic states, the Sudetenland, Carpathia and Upper Italy.

In a systematically pedantic way, parts of the territories of neighbouring European nations are made to fit the German understanding of “Middle Europe”. Districts of “Romania inside the Carpathian Arc”, the Bukovina, Ukrainian districts of Galicia, “Transcarpathia”, the “district of Grodno in White Russia and, yes, even “the present day Russian Enclave of Kaliningrad” are treated in this way. The Baltic states are mentioned as having belonged to the Order of Teutonic Knights along with East Prussia from the 13th to the 15th Century. The wars of extermination of Slavs by the Teutonic Order were not found to be worthy of mention. Instead the “Middle Europe” text produced by the Foreign Office remarks on the cultural merits of the Baltic Germans as “bearing a leading societal role”.
ProvocationGermans dominate the “Middle Europe” fiction in the West, as in “North Schleswig” (Denmark) and in Luxemburg. Belgium is relieved of its “German districts” and France of Alsace and Lorraine. The “Region” (Alsace-Lorraine) is stated “to carry a strong French character today” – and this concerning a part of French territory! According to the report this character should belong to “an autonomous native people”. This issue is associated with the supposed issue of a semi-German local language. “At any rate” the report proudly states the “Region” (Alsace-Lorraine) “Belonged to the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation and was part of Reich territory from 1871 to 1918 – a matter completely unconnected with the situation arising in the Second World War.” The authors ignore the fact that military aggression and annexation of neighbouring areas by German troops could never lead to a genuine “cultural community” but quite the reverse. Neither do they consider the effects of renewed demands of a similar nature, especially on account of the connection with the Nazi occupation of Alsace –Lorraine. This is a matter which has previously only been taken up by right wing extremists and out-and-out revisionists. So the provocation has become much more serious since the German Foreign Office took up the cause.
It is abundantly clear that the “Large Space Reorganisation (Grossraumgliederung)” is intended “for the political and administrative purposes” of the German authorities. So this revisionist framework stands in the tradition of similar German attempts to base demands for leading power status in Europe, founded on reviving aspects of the Middle Ages. Elite German geographers reached a high point in these endeavours when they placed their services at the disposal of the Nazi regime. As investigations have shown (5) this involved direct cooperation with the Foreign Office and other departments of the Nazi regime. The resulting maps were used, amongst other things, to plan the attack on Poland and assisted greatly in the expulsion campaigns against the Polish population. (6) The new charts recall the time when Poland was seen as a reservoir of slave labour in the Nazi version of a teutonic “Middle Europe”.
BackgroundIt seems to be unknown to today’s planners in the Foreign Office that “Middle Europe” was “a synonym for racial-eugenic concepts and economic plunder” (7) – or, what is worse, something which must be denied. The implementation of “The historical Development of the concept of Middle Europe” was attempted in 1916 (8) and was considered again after 1945. The air-brushing out of the Nazi European dictatorship under the title of “Middle Europe” saves the originators from drawing attention to the economic and military background of the up-and-coming “Middle Europe” fiction in Germany.
ImperiumAs standard works of international history succinctly establish, the German programme for “Middle Europe” stands in a hundred year tradition of economic domination for Germany “ to bring the Northern, Southern and Western edges of the continent around the centre of power” (9) around Germany and its satellites in East and South Eastern Europe. A concurrent target of the Middle Europe project is the creation of “an informal European imperium”, based on the Single Market without customs barriers, so that German industry can find an optimal market for its products and for the provision of raw materials. In view of this intention , the new edition of the design for “Middle Europe” in the German Foreign Office is no surprise and is timely for the presidency of a united Germany over the rest of the European Union.
References (in German) and excerpts from the maps mentioned appear in the article entitled "Deutsches Imperium Europa” German original with a map: http://www.german-foreign-policy.com/de/fulltext/56679

R.I.P. Saddam

I refuse to call Saddam a tyrant, due to his protection of Orthodox Christian minorities in Iraq. As well calling a leader of a country a tyrant is the favourite tactic of the Empire to demonise a leader as the devil incarnate and use this as a pretext to bomb and occupy entire countries. The media is always mobilised to blacken someone beyond redemption; to even accept it in the slightest is to give some kind of oxygen to the grotesque lies. So for instance, some will say the war was immoral or illegal, but then they backtrack in an effort to compromise and somehow better fit the media image that has been spun by saying, but Saddam was evil and the country is better off without him. Imagine if I were to go and rob a property, killing family members and executing the head of the household in an attempt to plunder the property. What kind of an excuse would it be to say: 'Oh he was evil and a tyrant'. That may well be, but thats hardly an excuse for the crimes I commited, and no one would have accepted that excuse as a reason for robbing the house and killing people, so why accept it after the event? Anyone that agreed with with the statement about the original occupant being evil would be to some extent playing down the original crime itself, and justifying the completely unjustifiable criminal act that occured. If you give the Empire an inch they take a mile, I refuse to retreat in the slightest, and will not parrot even 1% of their excuses or apologetics for their heinous acts.

Saddam has been hanged. Off course those who sufferred under his 20+ years of rule welcomed and likely rejoiced at his execution. Who else rejoiced, those who masterminded the Imperial invasion of Iraq in 2003, the very same people who gave Hussein weapons and support back in the 1980s, who also are the people without whose assisgtance the atrocities he was hanged for could not of occured. Debating the fairness of his trial or the legitimacy of the court is pointless now. Onething can be certain, the timing of the execution again shows the stupidity of the American Imperialists.

The execution occured on the first day of Eid al-adha, the Feast of Sacrifice that marks the end of the hajj (the annual muslim pilgrimmage to Mecca). It is a holiday marked by ritual slaughter of lambs - sacrifices - to celebrate the fulfillment of Muslims' religious duty to make pilgrimage to Mecca

Because he was executed on that day (one of the most holy days to Muslims) and the fact that his last words (reportedly) called for jihad (http://www.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=fcf9e950-c3c8-46a2-ad44-6c7d02b55c66&k=91791), Saddam Hussein may well become a martyr for millions of Muslims. That's a long way from being a secular dictator who waged war on the Islamic Republic of Iran in the 1980s. And it was American intervention that created "Saddam the martyr," of that there is no question.

Napoleon's foreign minister, Talleyrand, once commented on a politically motivated murder: "Worse than a crime, it was a blunder." (quoated at http://www.sslmit.unibo.it/%7Eguy/tan.htm). While I consider the 2003 invasion and the subsequent occupation of Iraq clearly evil, the execution of Saddam Hussein, and on a major Islamic holiday no less, is seriously and utterly stupid.

This execution should not be unexpected, Saddam was clearly marked for execution when he was captured in late 2003 especially since the Americans, Englandand their ally Israel have wanted to destroy the secular and nationalist regime Saddam had in Iraq. It is clear that Saddam was an enemy of Israel and Turkey (all American allies) (http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/01/setting_the_rec.html). It is clear that he was their enemy as he has always supported the cause of the Palestinians (being one opf their few true allies in the world) and he himself hwelped many anti-Turkey projects including supporting the PKK (http://www.hri.org/news/turkey/trkpr/2000/00-12-19.trkpr.html#16), the Kurdish resistance movement in Turkey even though Kurds have designs to detach northern Iraq from Iraq.

The worst part of the U.S. invasion is that Orthodox Christians in Iraq will suffer. Sadaam's right hand man until the bitter end was Arab Orthodox Christian Tariq Aziz, and the Orthodox Christians in Iraq, prior to the American-British invasion that commenced three years ago, were by some estimates close to 20percent of the population, arguably the highest Orthodox Christian population in the Muslim-dominated region, and many ,many times higher than the respective Orthodox Christian populations of Israel or Turkey , which are closer to a grim one percent of the overall population. It's a shame that the liberal/leftist media and governments in Orthodox countries were always quick to condemn BOTH the American invasion and Saddam due to his "human rights" record! I guess the fact that fellow Orthodox Christians , by the hundreds of thousands, lived in relative peace throughout his reign , is irrelevant to the parochial mindset of a democratic denizen in the world. His benevolent and protective policy toward our fellow Orthodox Christians, who can now face the grim and ever depleting fate of Orthodox Christians in democracies such as Israel and Turkey, this is evidently clear as most estimates place that of those who have fled Iraq's civil war a minimum of 40% are Orthodox Christians with some saying that 80% are.

'Dubya' issued a statement saying that Saddam's execution was "the kind of justice he denied the victims of his brutal regime". If Saddam did any evil he will be judged by God for it. But an American show trial, after an immoral invasion, after a monstrous lie is not justice for anyone.

Bush thought that sleeping through the execution on his ranch would help to create the image that this was Iraqi justice, nothing could be further from the truth. America acted illegally according to their beloved international law (remember that the reason for half their invasions is to uphold it). Firstly occupying powers under international law are expressly prohibited from changing the judicial structures of occupied states. Secondly prisoners of war (and the Americans concede Saddam was one) are not allowed to be handed over for trial by their former enemies. Thirdly as a former head of state Saddam is afforded sovereign immunity to prosecution, and you cannot pass retrospective laws to counter this.

Created by Paul Bremer, the Iraqi Higher Criminal Court was never anything but a US-orchestrated puppet court. Violations of commonly accepted principles of law include (this is an incomplete list):
(i)American imposed censorship of court proceedings
(ii)Withholding of evidence from the defence
(iii)Forcible ejection from court of defence lawyers and the placing of defence lawyers under house arrest
(iv)Denial of defence counsel access to defendants
(v)Blatant lack of impartiality of court judges
(vi)Overt political interference in the selection of court officials and the prejudicing of the trial and trial outcome by statements made by invested political figures — including George W Bush — affirming progress towards, or demanding, execution
(vii)The replacement of four of the five originally selected court judges
(viii)Lack of equality of arms between the prosecution and the defence
(ix)Failure to ensure the security of the defence leading to the murder of three defence lawyers

Some trial when one judge resigns due to American interference, and the next is fired by the Americans. Saddam was executed after a 'trial' about the events surrounding the attempted assassination of him in a shiite town. America purposefully made sure that he was executed before much bigger issues such as the gassing of Kurds, the invasion of Iran and Kuwait could be investigated. Their complicity in supplying Saddam with weapons and encouragement would have been uncovered. Yet they use these alleged human rights abuses as reasons to depose him (in retrospect, since that wasnt the reason given at the time of the invasion). Yet Margaret Beckett, the British Foreign Secretary, claimed that Saddam had been "held to account".The cherry on the mountainous cake of lies came after Saddams execution. Even in death they tried to smear him. Iraqi National Security Adviser Mouwafak al-Rubaie said that Saddam went to the gallows quietly:
"He was very, very, broken." He said that Saddam turned to look at him. "He was frightened. It was clear in his face."

This moron clearly has the same respect for the general publics intelligence that Bliar does. Did he not consider that the video footage his government ordered shot would reveal the emptiness of his lies?

Saddam went to his death shouting: "God is great. The nation will be victorious. Palestine is Arab." Judge Moneer Haddad, one of the appeal court judges who had been invited to watch Saddam die said:
"he was not afraid of anyone, it was a terrifying scene. Saddam was in self-control. I was not expecting him to be like that".

Serbia selling weapons to Armenia

Great news Serbia is engaging in arms sales to Armenia while at the same time not making arms sales to Georgia, the current sale is small (around $2 million US). This is great for several reasons-
1. It is helping Russia's interest.
2. It is improving relations with Russia and Armenia.
3. It is a sign of unity between Orthodox brothers, even though the Armenian church has some problems with it (being oriental orthodox, not eastern orthodox)
4. It is a sale opposed by the European Union and Turkey.
5. It will help defend Armenia against their enemy the Azerbaijani's. as Turkey is unlikely to fight Armenia for various interest (the EU and fear of not provoking Kurds to increase their insurgency, who tend to have good relations with Armenians), but Azerbaijan is a different story.

Russia agrees with Serbia's arms sale to Armenia, Serb president says
BELGRADE, Serbia: Serbia has secured Russia's consent to proceed with a planned arms deal with Armenia, defusing earlier objections from Moscow that caused upheaval at a Serbian weapons manufacturer, the president said Friday.

President Boris Tadic said "the issue has been successfully resolved" in his meeting with Russia's ambassador to Belgrade, Aleksander Alexeyev, who has given "a positive response" to Serbia's appeal that the Zastava arms company is allowed to sell guns and rifles worth US$2.55 million (€1.94 million) to Armenia.

Earlier this month Zastava criticised the Serbian government for withholding permission for its previously arranged sale to Armenia, allegedly because Russia — Serbia's traditional ally — objected to the Serbian supplier venturing into a market usually supplied by Moscow.

Zastava, based in the industrial city of Kragujevac, 90 kilometers (55 miles) southeast of Belgrade, is majority state-owned but its management enjoys some autonomy in negotiating arms deals. Actual exports, however, can be completed only with a government clearance.

Zastava's unionized workforce of 2,600 has been on strike, demanding financial compensation from the government because of the blocked sale to Armenia. Defense officials have flatly rejected the demand.

The dispute deepened this week when 80 Zastava workers seized control of Kragujevac city hall, saying they would keep up their protest until the authorities either approve the export or cover any loss caused by the ban.

There was no immediate comment to Tadic's announcement from Zastava managers or protesting workers.

The issue has become an embarrassment for Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica ahead of Jan. 21 parliamentary elections. Tadic is his political rival, heading the opposition Democratic Party that currently leads in opinion polls.

Great picture of the truth regarding the EU

One of the things I despise most is globalization particularly the European Union. A very useless organization that is detrimental to all nations of Europe, whether the people accept it or not. Belkow is a picture of what I think of it, an organization with too much bureucracy consisting of extremely degenerate Germanic neo-liberals with their heads showed up each others asses.

Welcome The New Year

Happy New Year Friends ,readers, comrades and enemies. May the year 2007 bring us what 2006 did not and no previous year ever has: truth, justice, compassion and understanding that are a true sign of civility and the easy way to measure humanity. Although I must say January 1st is nothing more then the western corrupt new years of the revised julian calendar the true new years is January 14th of the old and only true julian calendar.

Inspired by a fellow blogger (Hellenic Nationalist) I plan to use this blog as a stream of consciousness, a soapbox, and a bitching post. I offer the perspective of an old world Nationalistic upbringing while raised in the cultureless and nation-less Western world of meaningless nation-less nihilism and market values. I will be a critic and a dilettante and I hold dear to my heart the dream of a Nationalist Revolution in my Fatherland, Serbia, and in the fatherlands of our friends, the Greeks, the Russians, all Orthodox peoples and all opponents of the west.